Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Thoughts on libertarianism and unions

     Today I went to a hearing in Concord on the so-called Right-to-Work bill. The word "libertarian" came up a couple of times, and was misused both times, by people speaking for and against the bill. I was an "early libertarian"; I knew Murray Rothbard; I worked on the Hospers campaign and many more, and was either the first or the second secretary (I think someone else served briefly, stopped attending meetings, and I was asked to serve and did) of LPNH. I ran for various political offices. I was one of the people who helped LPNH get ballot status, was registered to vote as a Libertarian, ran for office as a Libertarian, and then watched Howard Wilson cost the party that status. I watched the party get and lose status again. I watched the party forget the roots of libertarianism and be taken over by Republican neo-cons who called themselves Libertarians
     Libertarianism originated in France, in the 1880s. It was a workers' movement, in which people would voluntarily band together and work together in syndicates, sharing skills and resources to produce goods and services in voluntary association and working to dismantle the state.
    Corporations are anti-libertarian creations, artificial people protected by government fiat. They cannot exist in a libertarian society. Unions, as voluntary associations for a shared purpose, can exist. Religious organizations may exist on the same basis of voluntary membership. It is an ideal of libertarianism that the state will no longer exist, but that's utopian. Libertarians generally accept the idea of a limited state to provide for defense from force and from fraud.
     Given the current structure of society, many libertarians work for government, because government is the major employer of educated and skilled workers. Only 47% of US adults have full-time jobs. Almost half of full-time jobs are in Federal, state, county, municipal, school districts, or the US military. A majority of professional, technical, and paraprofessional workers work in the government sector or the non-profit sector. Most unskilled workers work in the for-profit sector.
     Labor unions are, as they always have been, libertarian organizations. No one has to join one; only about 9% of US jobs are unionized. Workers choose to organize a union, elect leaders, set budgets, pay dues, and negotiate contracts. Employers choose to whether the union will be able to assess fees from workers who do not join, to cover the cost of negotiations and grievance arbitration; they can accept or reject this in negotiations. Neither the union nor the employer can coerce the other. (My sister applied, in New Jersey-- a heavily unionized state-- for an accounting position. The employer, eager to hire her, offered in addition to the advertised pay and benefits to pay her union initiation fee up-front for her and her union dues on a continuing basis. She accepted.) Federal law requires that the union represent everyone in the workplace, whether they are a member or not or a fee-payer or not. These "free-riders" cost unions time and money and often build resentment among workers.     
    If someone chooses to work for a unionized employer, such as the state of NH, that's a choice. The new worker is given information on the union, and after they complete their one-year probationary period, must choose whether to join the union or to pay agency fee, as the employer and the union agreed in the contract. Many workers choose to join sooner, since the union offers free or heavily discounted legal services, scholarship programs, credit cards and student loan options and mortgage programs,, insurance programs, and emergency help, along with various discounts on goods and services, as part of the association benefits for members. Members may choose to voluntarily contribute to a union PAC for political activity.
     Labor unions are libertarian organizations. Union membership is a libertarian choice. Right-to-work is an anti-libertarian bill.

4 comments:

  1. If you were the face of the Libertarian party, I'd be one. Since you are not, I'm not. I'm not a neo-con posing as a libertarian. Thank you for the cogent commentary!

    ReplyDelete
  2. No one has to join a unions? There are some businesses where the unions have managed to, as a prerequisite for employment at said business, require union membership. Also, unions enjoy special protections (granted by government... not too much unlike corporations!) that individuals do not have, such as being protected from termination in the event of a strike.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Adam: Only about 9% of US workers belong to unions. No one has to join a union. Unions cannot set the conditions of employment. Employers (note that I did not say corporations) can, with or without union input. When an employer and a union agree to conditions the government has no right to intervene. It's extremely difficult for workers to organize under Taft-Harley. Voluntary association does not grant special rights; incorporation does, and should not. There is no protection from termination in the event of a strike unless the employer agreed to it previously, and public employees are generally prohibited from striking. In NH, arch-conservative governor Meldrim Thomson signed public employee collective bargaining rights into law precisely because he understood the dangers of public employees not being prohibited from striking.

    ReplyDelete
  4. There are also 'Hiring Halls' which effectively exclude non-union labor.

    What about the statistic that over 40% of public sector employees are unionized?

    No protection from termination? From the federal laws I skimmed over, one can hire a 'permanent replacement' worker if one is striking over a pay hike... but one can't hire a 'permanent replacement' if a worker is striking over unfair labor practices. Seems like a special protection to me... but a 'permanent replacement' still does not involve the technical firing of the striking worker. It does not show as a poor mark on their resume.

    There is the additional concern that public sector unions are a completely different beast, in that they do not negotiate with their employer (the taxpayer), while private sector unions do. Public sector unions have a conflict of interest problem in that they are essentially employees of the taxpayer negotiating with one another.

    I happen to agree that the basic concept of unions is a libertarian one. I just think that a large percentage of unions have been corrupted in a similar way that companies have been through incorporation... they got the government to give them special protections that individuals do not have. Various federal laws that protect union labor (but not non-union) are a prime example.

    ReplyDelete